Submit an Article Become a Reviewer

Reading: New Roles, New Responsibilities: Examining Training Needs of Repository Staff


A- A+
dyslexia friendly

Research Article

New Roles, New Responsibilities: Examining Training Needs of Repository Staff


Natasha Simons ,

Senior Project Manager, eResearch Services, Scholarly Information and Research, Griffith University
X close

Joanna Richardson

Information Services Scholarly Information and Research Griffith University Nathan Campus 170 Kessels Road Nathan, QLD 4111 Australia
X close


INTRODUCTION Institutional repositories play a critical role in the research lifecycle. Funding agencies are increasingly seeking an improved return on their investment in research. Repositories facilitate this process by providing storage of, and access to, institutional research outputs and, more recently, research data. While repositories are generally managed within the academic library, repository staff require different skills and knowledge compared with traditional library roles. This study reports on a survey of Australasian institutional repository staff to identify skills and knowledge sets. METHODS Institutional repository staff working at universities in Australia and New Zealand were invited to participate in an online survey which incorporated both open and closed-ended question types. RESULTS The survey found significant gaps in the current provision of formal training and coursework related to institutional repositories, which echoed findings in the United Kingdom, Italy, and the United States. DISCUSSION There is clearly a need for more and varied training opportunities for repository professionals. Repository work requires a specific set of skills that can be difficult to find and institutions will benefit from investing in training and ongoing development opportunities for repository staff. CONCLUSION The data from this study could be used to facilitate staff recruitment, development, training, and retention strategies.
Volume: 1,  Issue: 2
Published on 28 Sep 2012.
Peer Reviewed


  • PDF

    comments powered by Disqus