Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: On the Mark? Responses to a Sting

Download

A- A+
dyslexia friendly

Commentary

On the Mark? Responses to a Sting

Authors:

Amy Buckland ,

eScholarship, ePublishing & Digitization Coordinator, McGill University Library
X close

Martin Paul Eve,

Lecturer, College of Arts, Lincoln University (UK)
X close

Graham Steel,

Patient Advocate and Open Science Enthusiast
X close

Jennifer Gardy,

Assistant Professor, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia
X close

Dorothea Salo

Faculty Associate, School of Library and Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison
X close

Abstract

It all seems very simple. A researcher writes up her findings to share them with her community. The findings are sent to a journal where the editor sends the manuscript out to peers to read. The reviewers comment and return the manuscript to the editor. The editor either asks the researcher to address the comments, or rejects the manuscript based on the reviews. The researcher sends their final manuscript to the editor, who in turn works with the publisher to ensure dissemination. Done.
DOI: http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1116
How to Cite: Buckland, A. et al., (2013). On the Mark? Responses to a Sting. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2(1), p.eP1116. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1116
1643
Views
3048
Downloads
Altmetric
Published on 09 Dec 2013.

Downloads

  • PDF

    comments powered by Disqus