Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Open Access Policies and Academic Freedom: Understanding and Addressing Conflicts

Download

A- A+
dyslexia friendly

Theory Article

Open Access Policies and Academic Freedom: Understanding and Addressing Conflicts

Author:

David James Johnston

University of Windsor, CA
About David
Scholarly Communications Coordinator
X close

Abstract

The adoption of open access (OA) policies that require participation rather than request it is often accompanied by concerns about whether such mandates violate researchers’ academic freedoms. This issue has not been well explored, particularly in the Canadian context. However the recent adoption of an OA policy from Canada’s major funding agencies and the development of the Fair access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR) in the United States has made addressing the issue of academic freedom and OA policies an important issue in academic institutions. This paper will investigate the relationship between OA mandates and academic freedom with the context of the recent OA policy at the University of Windsor as a point of reference. While this investigation concludes that adopting OA policies that require faculty participation at the institutional level should not be an issue of academic freedom, it is important to understand the varied factors that contribute to this tension. This includes misunderstandings about journal based (gold) and repository based (green) OA, growing discontent about increased managerialism in universities and commercialization of research, as well as potential vagueness within collective agreements’ language regarding academic freedom and publication. Despite these potential roadblocks, a case can be made that OA policies are not in conflict with academic freedom given they do not produce the harms that academic freedom is intended to protect.
DOI: http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2104
How to Cite: Johnston, D.J., (2017). Open Access Policies and Academic Freedom: Understanding and Addressing Conflicts. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 5(1), p.eP2104. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2104
426
Views
144
Downloads
Altmetric
Published on 04 Apr 2017.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus