Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Confused about copyright? Assessing Researchers’ Comprehension of Copyright Transfer Agreements

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Research Article

Confused about copyright? Assessing Researchers’ Comprehension of Copyright Transfer Agreements

Authors:

Alexandra Kohn ,

McGill University, Montreal QC, CA
X close

Jessica Lange

McGill University, Montreal QC, CA
X close

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Academic authors’ confusion about copyright and publisher policy is often cited as a challenge to their effective sharing of their own published research, from having a chilling effect on selfarchiving in institutional and subject repositories, to leading to the posting of versions of articles on social networking sites in contravention of publisher policy and beyond. This study seeks to determine the extent to which authors understand the terms of these policies as expressed in publishers’ copyright transfer agreements (CTAs), taking into account such factors as the authors’ disciplines and publishing experience, as well as the wording and structure of these agreements. METHODS We distributed an online survey experiment to corresponding authors of academic research articles indexed in the Scopus database. Participants were randomly assigned to read one of two copyright transfer agreements and were subsequently asked to answer a series of questions about these agreements to determine their level of comprehension. The survey was sent to 3,154 participants, with 122 responding, representing a 4% response rate. Basic demographic information as well as information about participants’ previous publishing experience was also collected. We analyzed the survey data using Ordinary Least Squared (OLS) regressions and probit regressions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Participants demonstrated a low rate of understanding of the terms of the CTAs they were asked to read. Participants averaged a score of 33% on the survey, indicating a low comprehension level of author rights. This figure did not vary significantly, regardless of the respondents’ discipline, time in academia, level of experience with publishing, or whether or not they had published previously with the publisher whose CTA they were administered. Results also indicated that participants did equally poorly on the survey regardless of which of the two CTAs they received. However, academic authors do appear to have a greater chance of understanding a CTA when a specific activity is explicitly outlined in the text of the agreement.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2253
How to Cite: Kohn, A. and Lange, J., 2018. Confused about copyright? Assessing Researchers’ Comprehension of Copyright Transfer Agreements. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 6(1), p.eP2253. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2253
469
Views
260
Downloads
Altmetric
Published on 03 Dec 2018.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus